Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ndt-users - Re: Opinion poll time, what SDK should NDT recommend?

Subject: ndt-users list created

List archive

Re: Opinion poll time, what SDK should NDT recommend?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Richard Carlson <>
  • To: Simon Leinen <>, Matt Mathis <>
  • Cc: "Jeff W. Boote" <>,
  • Subject: Re: Opinion poll time, what SDK should NDT recommend?
  • Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:28:09 -0400

Hi Simon;

At 02:27 PM 8/24/2006, Simon Leinen wrote:
Matt Mathis writes:
> With NPAD we have chosen to pin SDK to version 1.3, because it
> currently has the broadest support on the clients. As soon as we
> get a report that the SW is too old to run on some platform, will
> consider moving forward. Since the developers often have newer
> systems this requires forcing the version down on the compile:

> javac -source 1.3 DiagClient.java

This is nice from a backwards compatibility point of view, but
wouldn't that break IPv6 support?
Personally I think this is worth requiring Java 1.4 or better.

Can you check this out and see what happens?
the commands
cd Applet
javac -source 1.3 Tcpbw100.java
jar -cmf MANIFEST.MF Tcpbw100.jar Tcpbw100*.class
cp Tcpbw100.jar /usr/local/ndt

should get you a new binary. You will need to close and re-open the browser to get it to pick up the new applet.

> We have zero java version complaints since doing this. The decision
> to move forward will not be made without weighing the pros and cons
> pretty carefully. NPAD and NDT should probably be synchronized....

Why? (Competition is good! :-)

Matt and I have talked about combining these 2 tools. We both think it would be good for the community, but don't expect it to happen overnight. .-)

--
Simon.

------------------------------------



Richard A. Carlson e-mail:

Network Engineer phone: (734) 352-7043
Internet2 fax: (734) 913-4255
1000 Oakbrook Dr; Suite 300
Ann Arbor, MI 48104



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page