ndt-users list created

[Simon Leinen <>]

Matt Mathis writes:
> With NPAD we have chosen to pin SDK to version 1.3, because it
> currently has the broadest support on the clients.  As soon as we
> get a report that the SW is too old to run on some platform, will
> consider moving forward.  Since the developers often have newer
> systems this requires forcing the version down on the compile:

>       javac -source 1.3 DiagClient.java

This is nice from a backwards compatibility point of view, but
wouldn't that break IPv6 support?
Personally I think this is worth requiring Java 1.4 or better.

> We have zero java version complaints since doing this.  The decision
> to move forward will not be made without weighing the pros and cons
> pretty carefully.  NPAD and NDT should probably be synchronized....

Why? (Competition is good! :-)
-- 
Simon.