Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: 2.0 Status Update & Request for Feedback

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: 2.0 Status Update & Request for Feedback


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To: "Chad La Joie" <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: 2.0 Status Update & Request for Feedback
  • Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:02:47 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mv+wyzh+Gkevrs8sW1WbPvYcsGQ2t28skytfG1z3e7EAo9A/cLTDKPSe2khoyYO+YGI9EmUF0Gc1t+iS4GrUzhvv3YtT0X+YKGA2k2pRag+8fx2qDZ3KaqfFqsy/7pc8xPlbpTycAFP+QOJE4xldFGFYa7vpU5LN1LdLG4Z4YUc=

On 3/2/06, Tom Scavo
<>
wrote:
>
> Likewise we rely on the Shib 1.3 IdP to respond to attribute queries
> (apart from SSO). Will this continue to be supported in Shib 2.0?

Can somebody comment on this? (If you prefer we take it over to
shib-dev, that's fine.) From my point of view, this is the most
important question asked in this thread.

Thanks,
Tom



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page