Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: 2.0 Status Update & Request for Feedback

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: 2.0 Status Update & Request for Feedback


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Scott Cantor" <>
  • To: "'Tim Freeman'" <>, "'Tom Scavo'" <>
  • Cc: <>, <>
  • Subject: RE: 2.0 Status Update & Request for Feedback
  • Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:45:16 -0500
  • Organization: The Ohio State University

> This document "Use of SAML for OGSA Authorization" outlines the details:
> http://www.globus.org/toolkit/security/ogsa/authz/OGSA-SAML-au
> thorization-profile-june4.pdf

Is the intent to keep using a legacy SAML specification, and/or a deprecated
feature of SAML in general?

I understand that you still have to support the existing profile, I'm just
asking about the future direction.

I'm not looking forward to a SAML 2.1, but I would definitely not want to
see authorization decision kept *again* because people were still using it.
So maybe the better question is, even if we implement the 2.0 version, can
people please not use it? ;-)

-- Scott




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page