Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - Re: 2.0 Status Update & Request for Feedback

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: 2.0 Status Update & Request for Feedback


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Tom Scavo" <>
  • To: "Chad La Joie" <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: 2.0 Status Update & Request for Feedback
  • Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 13:05:05 -0500
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SkRVqGuWGOXL9mU1DhdrJIl+EVXwRk2/qFniz12s9nbC2vyGZL29u/N2UmTjYWCTvazM4RDKQkGjJ4BGMbS4DwkKaXQjRrKolivupe2ZMlM2xYew15cENWbivEsGWcKAc+dhHcvCMKyEbvRetFBG0XJ/ZU7DfUwccJs1cPZbYQE=
On 3/2/06, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
>
> I'd like to request some feedback in the area
> of profile and binding support.
>
> Profile & Binding Questionare
> What features do you currently use?
> What features would you like to see added?
> What things have you tried to do but could not with the current code?

Chad, are you referring to past usage of profiles and bindings in SAML
1.1 (in which case there are only two profiles and one binding) or
future projected usage of profiles and bindings in SAML 2.0 (in which
case there are a boat load)?

Thanks,
Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page