OpenSAML user discussion

[Chad La Joie <>]

Yes.

What features do you currently use (in the existing code) and what would 
you like to see added?  What things can you just not do in the existing 
code and would thus like to see in the new code.

And yes, as you pointed out, there are a significantly larger set of 
bindings and profiles in the SAML 2 spec.  I feel pretty safe in saying 
that OpenSAML 2.0 will not have codified support for all of those but 
that as the need arises and time allows we'll try to add support for 
additional ones.

Tom Scavo wrote:
> On 3/2/06, Chad La Joie 
> <>
>  wrote:
>
> > I'd like to request some feedback in the area
> > of profile and binding support.
> >
> > Profile & Binding Questionare
> > What features do you currently use?
> > What features would you like to see added?
> > What things have you tried to do but could not with the current code?
>
>
> Chad, are you referring to past usage of profiles and bindings in SAML
> 1.1 (in which case there are only two profiles and one binding) or
> future projected usage of profiles and bindings in SAML 2.0 (in which
> case there are a boat load)?
>
> Thanks,
> Tom

--
Chad La Joie             2052-C Harris Bldg
OIS-Middleware           202.687.0124