wg-multicast - Re: the good and bad

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: the good and bad

From: Dave Hartzell <>
To:
Subject: Re: the good and bad
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 13:52:30 -0400

Any particular ATM switches? Cisco? Fore?

Russ Hobby wrote:

> Oh it wasn't a link speed problem, or a router speed problem. It was just
> that in the ATM LANE VLAN environment all multicast had to go though a few
> slow boxes (broadcast unknown servers) that were never intended to handle
> actual traffic streams.

Re: the good and bad, (continued)
- Re: the good and bad, Marshall Eubanks, 10/03/2001
  - Re: the good and bad, Lucy E. Lynch, 10/03/2001
    - Re: the good and bad, Rick Summerhill, 10/03/2001
      - Re: the good and bad, Brent Sweeny, 10/03/2001
        
        Re: the good and bad, René Hatem, 10/03/2001
        
        Re: the good and bad, Marshall Eubanks, 10/04/2001
        
        Re: the good and bad, Ted Hanss, 10/04/2001
    - Message not available
      - Re: the good and bad, Russ Hobby, 10/03/2001
        
        Re: the good and bad, Marshall Eubanks, 10/03/2001
        
        Re: the good and bad, Russ Hobby, 10/03/2001
        
        Re: the good and bad, Dave Hartzell, 10/03/2001
        
        Re: the good and bad, Guy Almes, 10/03/2001
- Re: the good and bad, Bill Owens, 10/03/2001
  - Re: the good and bad, Craig M. Votava, 10/03/2001
    - Re: the good and bad, Guy Almes, 10/03/2001
  - Re: the good and bad, Roy Hockett, 10/03/2001
- Re: the good and bad, Guy Almes, 10/03/2001
- Re: the good and bad, Alan Crosswell, 10/03/2001
- Re: the good and bad, Alan Crosswell, 10/03/2001
- RE: the good and bad, Richard Mavrogeanes, 10/08/2001

List archive

Re: the good and bad