Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] Return of the Java SP... again

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: [Shib-Dev] Return of the Java SP... again


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Jim Fox <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] Return of the Java SP... again
  • Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 21:43:46 -0700


I have never understood this concern. If one uses https always aren't the
pushed attributes encrypted?

Jim

On Aug 25, 2010, at 12:32 PM, Chad La Joie wrote:

> I would feel uncomfortable doing that. It feels like it would be
> encouraging a bad practice. Like you I don't get super freaked about
> pushing unencrypted attributes but I do feel it's not the ideal situation.
>
> On 8/25/10 3:29 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:
>>> Well, I think the problem is that there is quite a large SAML 1 only
>>> install base right now and a lot of them aren't show much sign of
>>> moving. We still know there are a significant number of folks running
>>> Shib 1.3 and many of the other opensource IdPs are are SAML 1 only.
>>
>> I guess a compromise with possibly useful side effects is not supporting
>> queries, so people would have to push attributes in the client with no
>> encryption. That seems to bug people, so I guess that's a way of
>> accomodating without encouraging.
>>
>> -- Scott
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Chad La Joie
> http://itumi.biz
> trusted identities, delivered




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page