shibboleth-dev - RE: opensaml.jar
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: opensaml.jar
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:32:44 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Our design or yours? In any event, I don't see how one can avoid
> HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse when designing around
> attribute exchange.
My design. You can certainly avoid it if you're doing the client side of
this (and the API isn't screwed up like now). Those are server-side
interfaces. For that matter, nobody forced me to use them at all, and Howard
explicitly asked me to refactor the server side of one of those interfaces
so that it didn't have to operate on the actual servlet interface.
> servlet.jar has tons of concrete classes in it, all kinds of
> useful stuff.
Then I'd say that's a bit of a concern, since AFAIK, servlet.jar would be
container-specific, no? I guess we can slide by in this case, but it's
definitely a bug in OpenSAML we need to fix.
-- Scott
- opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Chad La Joie, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.