shibboleth-dev - Re: opensaml.jar

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: opensaml.jar

From: Tom Scavo <>
To:
Subject: Re: opensaml.jar
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 07:51:56 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WKUzskhBc0Qn7RvR3/5D/y/QIdKghpohfEXNE2zhZTYD8SCWbUX70AqHJOsMUTdThj3S5qrlYm654OF3SLfZ9iDbEGxwZaYZYGCw7CPmuCN02KRXeypvpXvw4D+Keaaff100EusRx0wh6y8ED4ynImuZT4ZkAnBbGemS6sjoTn0=

On 8/29/05, Scott Cantor
<>
wrote:
>
> I don't see that we have a choice, I was merely pointing out that it
> reflects a mistake in design we should fix at some point.

Our design or yours? In any event, I don't see how one can avoid
HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse when designing around
attribute exchange.

> AFAIK, servlet.jar is like xml-apis.jar, right? Just an interface spec?

servlet.jar has tons of concrete classes in it, all kinds of useful stuff.

Tom

opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
  - Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
    - RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
      - Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
        
        RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
        
        Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
        
        RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
        Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
        RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
        Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
        RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
        Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
        RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
        
        Re: opensaml.jar, Chad La Joie, 08/30/2005
        Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
      - Re: opensaml.jar, Tim Freeman, 08/30/2005

List archive

Re: opensaml.jar