Shibboleth Developers

[Tim Freeman <>]

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:16:01 -0400
"Scott Cantor" 
<>
 wrote:

> > Hmm, is it unreasonable for an attribute requester to rely on
> > SAMLSOAPHTTPBinding?
> 
> No, not at all, I'm just saying there probably need to be separate
> interfaces for a client of the binding and a server. A client right now
> pulls in an interface that has a dependency on HttpServletRequest. That's
> not really necessary for clients.
> 
> Just hadn't come up until now, we didn't have any tools that were using it
> so I didn't think about it being a bad idea.

Maybe this should be moved to the opensaml list, I'd also like to request 
adding
support for in-memory JKS object as well as the current filesystem JKS support
in SOAPHTTPBindingProvider.  I could provide a patch for that (not right 
away). 

Thanks,
Tim