shibboleth-dev - RE: opensaml.jar
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: opensaml.jar
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 22:16:01 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> Hmm, is it unreasonable for an attribute requester to rely on
> SAMLSOAPHTTPBinding?
No, not at all, I'm just saying there probably need to be separate
interfaces for a client of the binding and a server. A client right now
pulls in an interface that has a dependency on HttpServletRequest. That's
not really necessary for clients.
Just hadn't come up until now, we didn't have any tools that were using it
so I didn't think about it being a bad idea.
-- Scott
- opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/30/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/30/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
- Re: opensaml.jar, Tom Scavo, 08/29/2005
- RE: opensaml.jar, Scott Cantor, 08/29/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.