shibboleth-dev - RE: target deploy guide, linux Q
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: ,
- Subject: RE: target deploy guide, linux Q
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 13:13:42 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> so -- just to confirm my understanding -- we could simplify the text
> in this linux section, to align with Derek's cookbook, and we should
> be ok....
Yes, we just need to be careful in separating stuff relating to the
binaries and stuff relating to the source.
When we talk about minimum versions for things, that's really a source
issue. The binaries really aren't guaranteed to work with anything they
weren't linked with. The reason is that a lot of open source projects
don't understand or use shared library versioning. They don't know when
to rev their library versions, so they either do it too often or not
enough.
> now, on to Solaris.... I suggested to Nate that he include text
> telling sites to install these specific versions ... anything else to
> add to this list?
The Apache package is only needed if the site isn't already using it. It
makes it a little easier to start, but it's not mandatory, as long as
the version used is the same. The advice about mod_ssl and so forth is
still valid. I built with EAPI defined.
-- Scott
PS. I have a script that shows how to build everything from source on
both OS's. Should we incorporate that somehow, or just put it somewhere
for reference if people want to see it?
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., (continued)
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Steven_Carmody, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Steven_Carmody, 11/17/2002
- target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- Re: target deploy guide, linux Q, Derek Atkins, 11/24/2002
- Re: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/24/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/25/2002
- Re: target deploy guide, linux Q, Derek Atkins, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/25/2002
- Re: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/24/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.