shibboleth-dev - Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me.
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "RL 'Bob' Morgan" <>
- To: Shibboleth Design Team <>
- Subject: Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me.
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 01:38:25 -0800 (PST)
OK, maybe a little light here.
I got it to work, sort of by accident (running now at
https://shib.cac.washington.edu/secure/ for your amusement), by setting up
a /usr/local/lib/apache directory for modules, instead of the default
/usr/local/apache which has a whole pile of modules in it, and putting
only a few modules in it (SSL, etc). So the httpd processes at that point
looked like:
apache 13753 0.1 1.5 13132 7936 ? S 00:49 0:00
/usr/sbin/httpd -DHAVE_SSL -DHAVE_CGI
since the /etc/init.d/httpd script does this munging to define HAVE_* for
all the modules.
By moving more modules about I was able to figure out that the sole
offending module is:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1561021 Apr 15 2002 libphp4.so*
That is, if that module is in the set of loaded modules, child httpds
segfault, but if it's not, then all is fine.
I noticed there's an updated libphp for RH7.3 (php-4.1.2-7.3.6), so I
installed that, but it didn't make any difference.
Now I suppose I should mention that shib.cac.washington.edu is a
dual-processor box, spose that could be a factor.
Anyway,
- RL "Bob"
On 16 Nov 2002, Derek Atkins wrote:
> I just tried installing the current linux beta distro on a clean
> RH7.3 machine and it worked just fine. Here's what I did:
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Beta-1 Guides, Nate Klingenstein, 11/04/2002
- RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/16/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/16/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/16/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Steven_Carmody, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Steven_Carmody, 11/17/2002
- target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/16/2002
- RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.