shibboleth-dev - Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me.
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From:
- To: Shibboleth Design Team <>
- Subject: Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me.
- Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:21:19 -0500
By moving more modules about I was able to figure out that the sole
offending module is:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1561021 Apr 15 2002 libphp4.so*
That is, if that module is in the set of loaded modules, child httpds
segfault, but if it's not, then all is fine.
iiiiinteresting.... I seem to recall that the folks at SWITCH -- the Swiss HE network -- had a similar problem with alpha-2.5. They also tracked it to php......
Now, we all know that the target side codebase for beta-1 is significantly different from alpha-2.5 (to say the least (-: ). But, its curious that php shows up again......
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Beta-1 Guides, Nate Klingenstein, 11/04/2002
- RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/16/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/16/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/16/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Steven_Carmody, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Steven_Carmody, 11/17/2002
- target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/16/2002
- RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/16/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.