shibboleth-dev - RE: target deploy guide, linux Q
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Scott Cantor <>
- To: ,
- Subject: RE: target deploy guide, linux Q
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 19:03:46 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> should we put the directions for compiling the source in the deploy
> guide, or should the deploy guide just point interested parties
> toward the cvs, and then put the directions into an INSTALL file
> that's in the cvs?
That makes sense. I'll try to start working on that.
> my inclination is to go with option two -- we ought to document it,
> and make it as straightforward as we can, but I suspect that most
> sites will just go with the binaries, if possible.
I think that will probably change as we move from testing to production
with this code. I realize that's a ways off, but my impression is
security software usually gets built from source depending on the
paranoia/caution of the sysadmin.
> I think this would be *extremely* useful to anyone trying to build --
> I'm just not sure how to distribute it.
Putting it in cvs and adding it to the make dist command makes sense.
-- Scott
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design-+
For list utilities, archives, subscribe, unsubscribe, etc. please visit the
ListProc web interface at
http://archives.internet2.edu/
------------------------------------------------------mace-shib-design--
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., (continued)
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Steven_Carmody, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., RL 'Bob' Morgan, 11/17/2002
- RE: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Scott Cantor, 11/17/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Derek Atkins, 11/17/2002
- target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/22/2002
- Re: target deploy guide, linux Q, Derek Atkins, 11/24/2002
- Re: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/24/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/25/2002
- Re: target deploy guide, linux Q, Derek Atkins, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/25/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/25/2002
- Re: target deploy guide, linux Q, Steven_Carmody, 11/24/2002
- RE: target deploy guide, linux Q, Scott Cantor, 11/22/2002
- Re: RH7.3 testing: the beta worked fine for me., Steven_Carmody, 11/17/2002
- RE: Beta-1 Guides, Scott Cantor, 11/26/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.