Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

wg-multicast - Re: multicast rollover

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: multicast rollover


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Marshall Eubanks" <>
  • To: Joel Jaeggli <>, Marshall Eubanks <>
  • Cc: Chuck Anderson <>,
  • Subject: Re: multicast rollover
  • Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:16:15 -0400

On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 09:47:09 -0700 (PDT)
Joel Jaeggli
<>
wrote:
> coming from some chinese oem near you...
>
> http://www.coship.com/english/products/pdf/iptv.pdf
>
> anysight220

Good eyes, Joel. I got this annoihncemen but
didn't catch this.

I will try to write to them for more information.

Marshall

>
> joelja
>
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> > If anyone knows of any set-top box that speaks IGMPv3, I would
> > love to hear about it. It will go into my case for multicast
> > presentations.
> >
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2005 10:51:34 -0400
> > Chuck Anderson
> > <>
> > wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 11:52:46AM +0200, Thomas Kernen wrote:
> >>> It's great to hear that vendors are finally understanding SSM and
> >>> IGMPv3
> >>
> >> There are still some vendors out there who don't think it is a
> >> priority to implement IGMPv3 properly. I've mentioned one of them on
> >> here before. Does anyone have any tips for convincing vendors of the
> >> importance of SSM and IGMPv3 so that proper implementations will be
> >> forthcoming before the decade is over?
> >
> > Here is what I sent Apple on this topics (heavily revised and updated).
> > Feel free to use as
> > appropriate :
> >
> > Inter-domain multicast deployment for broadcasting (except on the I2) is
> > basically stalled,
> > as is deployment of globally routable multicast on the Internet
> > as a whole. See http://www.multicasttech.com/status/ for further details.
> > Deployment is stalled
> > because of the complexity of inter-domain any source multicast, and also
> > because of worries
> about
> > security vulnerabilities in inter-domain multicast. A new multicast
> > service model,
> Source-Specific
> > Multicast (SSM) has been developed to address these concerns, and is
> > especially appropriate in
> an
> > Internet video broadcasting environment.
> >
> > SSM deployment requires nothing from the broadcaster except the
> > selection of an appropriate
> > Multicast address, and little from the ISP. However, it does require
> > support from both the
> > player and OS of IGMPv3 on the receiver side, and as a practical matter
> > needs to be supported
> by
> > IGMP snooping switches.
> >
> > A new protocol, Automatic Multicast Tunneling (AMT), should allow for an
> > automatic multicast
> > rollover to unicast. AMT is specifically tailored to provide SSM support
> > for end users who do
> not
> > have access to inter-domain native multicast.
> >
> > SSM plus AMT offers a means of breaking the log-jam and providing usable
> > service.
> > Basically, this requires IGMPv3 support in the kernel, SSM support in
> > the player, IGMPv3
> support in
> > the switch, and use of the AMT shim. Three ISP's have indicated that they
> > would step up and
> provide
> > the multicast fan-out for AMT.
> >
> > As multicasting increasingly becomes the standard for IP video
> > distribution, video providers
> will
> > need SSM, both for protection of their content within the walled garden,
> > and to allow for the
> > provision of video content from outside the walled garden. My analysis of
> > the statistical
> > distribution of video content selection indicates that even the United
> > States should be able to
> > support 50,000 to 100,000 channels of video content (plus, of course, a
> > large amount of VOD,
> some of
> > which will need to be pre-cached), and the global numbers will be even
> > larger. Just as
> Amazon.com
> > is estimated to make some 40% of its sales from the several million
> > titles that it carries that
> do
> > not sell well enough to be stocked in bookstores, my models predict that
> > in a 100,000 channel
> video
> > distribution universe as much as 50% of the audience (and thus the
> > revenues) are likely to come
> > accrue to the ~ 99,000 channels that are not supported by the walled
> > gardens. The only
> realistic way
> > I see to support this will be through the use of SSM, IGMPv3 and (at
> > least in the near term)
> AMT.
> >
> > Regards
> > Marshall Eubanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Joel Jaeggli Unix Consulting
>
> GPG Key Fingerprint: 5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2
>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page