Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Chad La Joie <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst
  • Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 21:13:45 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ryI/ejPXfRtOsqE7/Pea25NKGVxf6qUY72Cf2lEMw7mf6EEzJDXP6YUc3sySRLQ0VH0m7JzsnaH5TXJ+zStyyVuk+IaF2bR/ZJHNDIMxbR4zkzdAM9Rbs30MykcN9dd3X4RoAtrEoOYu879WLj7JmYhKXPHwO4r8f6wKanArEHg=
On 5/23/05, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
>
> So, while I, personally, would have no problem telling people that the
> IdP runs on JDK 1.4 or above (I probably wouldn't even mind much saying
> 1.5 and above), I don't think you can tell vendors that. And if we want
> vendors to play nice with us, we'll have to play nice with them. If we
> take that view, then things like the Java SP and OpenSAML need to run on
> JDK 1.3, even if it does have rough edges.

I understand your rationale for wanting to do this but that is a huge
restriction. What a sad situation...

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page