shibboleth-dev - Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst

From: Tom Scavo <>
To: Chad La Joie <>
Cc:
Subject: Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 09:44:46 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OOb53cDXRb7IzZLMxsexw1Bo2DCtZiXfI9OpPQZlz3eelzMc7RiV2OEtstM10aZAkcP8xadBdO6VpVlmpKHehDw3FPQQ/C09CpjzxL1cqKFYBFpCPL4h5j/xQSMK2oacufokpz59v3tgnNsTdOkW21JD/Y/eJPUJvIrdlqthBlk=

On 5/24/05, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
> That makes sense. So, if JDK 1.3 compliance is something we want, then
> we could use something like the Jakarta Regexp library.

Yes, we can add third-party packages to achieve the functionality we
want. That's a reasonable compromise.

> I think what needs to be said (and maybe it has), for sure, is what JDK
> and J2EE version are supported. If it's stated and documented then we
> all know the target we're shooting for and we can make good decisions
> about what JDK/J2EE features to rely on vs using an external library.

I don't think this is documented anywhere (except in build files). If
it is, I missed it.

Thanks,
Tom

RE: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst, (continued)
- RE: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst, Wilcox, Mark, 05/23/2005

List archive

Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst