Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Chad La Joie <>
  • Cc:
  • Subject: Re: SHIB design call -- (5/23/2005), 3:00 pm est, noon pst
  • Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:35:16 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=O7UOMR+f5MS8338QdQqOzpKVN5lKhWkMNfmpFQEZ29JEGoAXHPQXmh/upusujQusx0+m9K8pB5/y01ymiPFxztLOdfu6mxBoFNc08uqu/X3lTd8NOREAJncxZcFjY/xeV6A3sDxeyi8R/rB+ZfyzesVZfdyDKFGu8ry4LeUyDvg=
On 5/24/05, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
> Oh, I think we're talking about two different things. I was talking
> about the JDK version. Yes, the current SP code does require 1.3
> because it does use filters. I don't know that any would suggest we go
> lower than J2EE 1.3. All the containers I know off support it.

No, we're talking about the same thing. I knew you were referring to
J2SE 1.3, but I was worried that this would lock us into a particular
version of J2EE. I was also worried that we'd be missing out on a lot
of what has become standard J2SE functionality, but you pointed out
that we could augment that with third-party libraries. I guess that's
okay.

Really though, it would be easier just to require J2SE 1.4. I don't
think that's all that farfetched.

Just my two cents worth,
Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page