Shibboleth Developers

[Chad La Joie <>]

Okay, my opinion then is that my time would be better spent helping you 
test this then doing the other container testing.  That can be done 
later, after 1.3 comes out, this really can't.  That will probably work 
out better with my GU work schedule anyways.

Scott Cantor wrote:
> > I haven't really looked at the OpenSAML code in depth.  Are 
> > there test cases to put the code through it's paces?
>
>
> I guess there's a difference between compiling it on 1.3 and running it on
> 1.3. Java's weird.
>
> The first step to me is compiling it. Since I don't think that will work,
> that's the first thing to overcome, finding all the newer classes.
>
> Beyond that, I don't have the discipline to write test cases that cover the
> code. There's a signature test case and a SOAP test case that do a pretty
> good job of testing the advanced features and a few test cases for basic
> objects.
>
>
> > Also, is there the expectation that a new version of OpenSAML will 
> > come out with the new version of Shib?
>
>
> Yes, that's why we only have that length of time to do it.
>
> -- Scott

--
Chad La Joie             315Q St. Mary's Hall
Project Sentinel         202.687.0124