wg-multicast - Re: Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering]

Subject: All things related to multicast

List archive

Re: Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering]

From: John Zwiebel <>
To: Bill Nickless <>
Cc:
Subject: Re: Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering]
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:56:19 -0700

On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 11:45 AM, Bill Nickless wrote:

Having only spent about 20-30 seconds thinking about it, I'm not sure
whether it's possible to configure popular routers to black-hole traffic
destined for groups that are in a table populated by BGP. Maybe an
inspiration will strike later?

I'm sure its possible, but it seems to me you open up a
huge security hole.

So you really want to start a "security for automated
router configuration" working group huh?

Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering], Bill Nickless, 09/04/2003
- Re: Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering], John Zwiebel, 09/04/2003
- Re: Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering], David Farmer, 09/04/2003
  - Re: Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering], Bill Nickless, 09/04/2003
    - Re: Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering], David Farmer, 09/04/2003
      - Re: Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering], David Farmer, 09/09/2003
  - Message not available
    - multicast stats, Jon Zeeff, 09/04/2003
      - Re: multicast stats, John Zwiebel, 09/04/2003
        
        VieoLAN (was multicast stats), Bill Owens, 09/04/2003
        
        Re: VieoLAN (was multicast stats), Greg Shepherd, 09/04/2003
      - Re: multicast stats, Kevin C. Almeroth, 09/04/2003
        
        Re: multicast stats, Greg Shepherd, 09/04/2003

List archive

Re: Bogon Multicast Groups [NANOG: What were we saying about edge filtering]