mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Jason Countryman" <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:37:18 -0400
Thank you guys so much. I didn't understand the XSAny at all. That makes all the difference in the world.
Thanks to all of your help, my assertion is now complete and I can move on...thank you so much.
That example was a spectacular help. Definitely find a place on the wiki for it. It would have saved me tons of time.
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, SpamAssassin & ClamAV. ______________________________ Jason T. Countryman Programmer Community Computer Service ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Brent Putman <> To: Sent: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:30:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe > On 4/21/2010 5:22 PM, Jason Countryman wrote:
> > See my earlier comments and example, the XSString usage here is what is throwing you off... > >
> > Absolutely, positively, don't modify the DOM like that. It's just wrong. > >
> > Right, it doesn't exist until the XMLObject is marshalled. Pretty much the whole purpose of the library is to provider an object wrapper around the DOM. You don't do anything with the DOM representation until you marshall it, and then you forget about the XMLObject, and do whatever you want to do with the DOM (serialize it, add it to another DOM structure, etc). ------- End of Original Message ------- This message and any attachments may contain information that is protected by law as privileged and confidential, and is transmitted for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, copying or retention of this e-mail or the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail, and permanently delete this e-mail. |
- Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Brent Putman, 04/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Scott Cantor, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Scott Cantor, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Scott Cantor, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Brent Putman, 04/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Brent Putman, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Scott Cantor, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Scott Cantor, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Scott Cantor, 04/21/2010
- RE: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Scott Cantor, 04/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Brent Putman, 04/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Jason Countryman, 04/21/2010
- Re: [OpenSAML] Need XMLObject in assertion, I believe, Brent Putman, 04/21/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.