wg-multicast - Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Jeff Fitzwater <>
- To:
- Cc: , OIT Network Systems Group <>
- Subject: Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:40:48 -0500
FYI
Jeff Fitzwater
OIT Network & Communications Systems
Princeton University
Princeton also saw the traffic and two of our downstream routers were also cooking. Interesting that our edge router tht connects to I2, did not have high CPU but the next two internal routers that have PIM enabled, did have 100% router CPU ( CISCO 720-3B )
On Feb 21, 2008, at 2:26 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
Greetings folks,
Pardon the operational content.
We just experienced a major amount (multi-megabit) of traffic coming from 136.244.96.104 going to the SAP/SDR multicast address and port (224.2.127.254/9875). All CPUs on our routers broke into a sweat as they tried to process this traffic. I verified this with fellow Canadian RAN Netera and CANARIE. CANARIE has since placed a filter against this address sending more traffic to our networks, but I was wondering if anyone else has felt this. Also if someone could track down the real owner of that IP and ask them to stop, that would be nice too. :-)
Thanks,
wfms
Manager, Special Projects, Advanced Infrastructures
National Research Council Canada
1200 Montreal Road
Ottawa,
Canada
K2S 1L2
- operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, William F. Maton Sotomayor, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Frank Fulchiero, 02/21/2008
- Message not available
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Frank Fulchiero, 02/21/2008
- Message not available
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Jeff Fitzwater, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Simon Lockhart, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Mark Boolootian, 02/21/2008
- RE: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Phil Palanchi, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Jeff Fitzwater, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Dave Diller, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, ken lindahl, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Jeff Fitzwater, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Havard Eidnes, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Frank Fulchiero, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Alan Crosswell, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Frank Fulchiero, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Alan Crosswell, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Frank Fulchiero, 02/21/2008
- Re: operational content - excessive traffic to port 9875, Frank Fulchiero, 02/21/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.