wg-multicast - Re: multicast stats
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: <>
- To: Marshall Eubanks <>
- Cc: Greg Shepherd <>, Jon Zeeff <>,
- Subject: Re: multicast stats
- Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 17:57:31 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
> Greg Shepherd
> <>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 16:03:28 -0400
> > > Jon Zeeff
> > > <>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How can I find out what are the most popular multicast uses on the
> > > > Internet? Or perhaps on Abilene (where netflow data is available).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For example, I assume that some of the UofOregon traffic is popular,
> > > > but
> > I
> > > > don't know for sure.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Ever since ASM RTCP receiver reports withered and died, no one really
> > knows.
> > > I am not really sure why this happened. Many people think that having
> > > each member of a large group send to every other member is not a good
> > thing,
> > > but I do not think that it was caused by complaints.
> >
> > I recall and early 'complaint' was during the NetAid broadcast. The issue
> > was not the sending/recieving of the packets, but the potential explosion
> > of state in the routers. Every sending 'receiver' would create an S,G
> > entry in the network. We were targeting 10K's of S's for just this one G.
> > It became clear that any large audience adoption of mcast would create an
> > unmanagable amount of network S,G state IF ASM RTCP were the receiver
> > reporting mechanism.
> >
> > > My experiments indicate that I do not get RR's for more than a tiny
> > > fraction (<< 1/10th) of the audience, but what that fraction is
> > > is unknown. Most times all I really know is whether or not
> > > I have outbound state.
> >
> > Marshall, does your app use mcast of ucast for receiver reports?
>
> The MCTPlayer does send back unicast RR's here, but its use has never been
> more
> than a small fraction of the total usage of our MP3 channels (about 1/8th
> of reported usage, which is of course not the full usage).
>
> Our new video multicasts use Quicktime (and Real, as soon as we get
> the bugs out), and those use standard RTCP.
'standard' RTCP being mcast?
Greg
> Marshall
>
> >
> > Greg
> >
> > > Marshall
> > >
> > >
> >
>
- multicast stats, (continued)
- Message not available
- multicast stats, Jon Zeeff, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, John Zwiebel, 09/04/2003
- VieoLAN (was multicast stats), Bill Owens, 09/04/2003
- Re: VieoLAN (was multicast stats), Greg Shepherd, 09/04/2003
- VieoLAN (was multicast stats), Bill Owens, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, Kevin C. Almeroth, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, Greg Shepherd, 09/04/2003
- Message not available
- Re: multicast stats, Jon Zeeff, 09/05/2003
- Re: multicast stats, Marshall Eubanks, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, Greg Shepherd, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, Marshall Eubanks, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, shep, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, Marshall Eubanks, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, Bob Riddle, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, Greg Shepherd, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, John Zwiebel, 09/04/2003
- multicast stats, Jon Zeeff, 09/04/2003
- Re: multicast stats, Marshall Eubanks, 09/04/2003
- Message not available
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.