wg-multicast - RE: BCP question
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: "Scott Robohn" <>
- To: "Marshall Eubanks" <>, <>, "Matthew Davy" <>
- Cc: "Bill Nickless" <>, "David Farmer" <>, <>
- Subject: RE: BCP question
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:12:18 -0700
Marshall/all,
I assume this is under "normal" conditions. Have you (or anyone else)
been able to digest the data from the worms earlier this year and see
what the spread looks like under those conditions? I've been curious as
to what proportion of the worm traffic was destined for the 224.0/16,
224.1/16, 224.2/16, and 233/8 blocks.
Thanks,
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
>
>
> [mailto:]
> On Behalf Of
> Marshall Eubanks
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:01 AM
> To:
> ;
> Matthew Davy
> Cc: Bill Nickless; David Farmer;
>
> Subject: Re: BCP question
>
>
> On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:25:12 -0500
> "David Farmer"
> <>
> wrote:
> > On 2 Sep 2003 Matthew Davy wrote:
> >
> > > So what about applications that are hard-coded to use
> this address space ?
> > > (*After* we flog the developers for doing something this
> bone-headed ;-)
> >
> > I'd suggest making them answer RIAA complaints for a couple
> months. ;-)
> >
> > > Should we block the addresses and then poke holes for the
> ones that need it
> > ?
> >
> > Don't know, that would seem logical unless their is a big
> number of wholes.
> > That
> > would be the killer for this idea.
> >
> > It probably wouldn't be a good idea to do this on Abilene, any other
> > backbone, or
> > even at GigaPOPs, but at a campus border I think it might be very
> > appropriate.
> >
> > > Does anyone have a feel for how common this is ?
> >
> > I'll spin this back to to you MSDP mister, how much MSDP
> state do we see for
> > these blocks over the next few weeks.
>
> Here is the current status
>
> First Octet Histogram
>
> Octet 224 had 529 entries or 39.21 %
> Octet 225 had 24 entries or 1.78 %
> Octet 226 had 7 entries or 0.52 %
> Octet 227 had 19 entries or 1.41 %
> Octet 228 had 72 entries or 5.34 %
> Octet 229 had 30 entries or 2.22 %
> Octet 230 had 9 entries or 0.67 %
> Octet 231 had 11 entries or 0.82 %
> Octet 233 had 499 entries or 36.99 %
> Octet 234 had 23 entries or 1.70 %
> Octet 235 had 14 entries or 1.04 %
> Octet 236 had 81 entries or 6.00 %
> Octet 237 had 16 entries or 1.19 %
> Octet 238 had 15 entries or 1.11 %
>
> So the reserved space is being used, at the few % level.
>
> Marshall
>
>
> Marshall
>
>
>
> >
> > There shouldn't be anyone doing SSM on these blocks should their?
> >
> > Therefore, we should see MSDP state for any traffic, right?
> >
> > Another way would be to look at Netflow, I think.
> >
> > > - Matt
> >
> > =================================================
> > David Farmer Email:
> >
> > Office of Information Technology
> > University of Minnesota Phone: 612-626-0815
> > 2218 University Ave SE Cell: 612-812-9952
> > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 FAX: 612-624-4035
> > =================================================
> >
>
>
- Re: BCP question, (continued)
- Re: BCP question, Greg Shepherd, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, David Farmer, 09/02/2003
- Re: BCP question, Marshall Eubanks, 09/02/2003
- Re: BCP question, John Zwiebel, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, Marshall Eubanks, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, David Farmer, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, Leonard Giuliano, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, David Farmer, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, John Zwiebel, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, David Farmer, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, Marshall Eubanks, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, Jannet Vanessa Carrera Herrera, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, John Zwiebel, 09/03/2003
- Re: BCP question, Marshall Eubanks, 09/02/2003
- Re: BCP question, Marshall Eubanks, 09/03/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.