Shibboleth Developers

[Jim Fox <>]

Me too.  What he said.

Jim


On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, Russell Beall wrote:

> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:09:17 -0700
> From: Russell Beall 
> <>
> To: 
> ""
>  
> <>
> Cc: Shibboleth Users 
> <>
> Reply-To: 
> ""
>  
> <>
> Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] [SURVEY] Different IdP Packaging
>
> I will generally echo the sentiments of list so far.
>
> Having established a well functioning IdP and being very familiar with
> the current process, which I do not see as difficult, I would like to
> see the packaging stay the same.  Furthermore, while a monolithic
> packaging system may make it easier for first-time deployers, one of
> the concepts I have seen as critical in the use of Shibboleth is
> having an understanding of what is going on.  Having a monolithic
> deployment option will just make it easier for newbies to consider
> that they don't really need to understand some of the underlying
> structure and just then expect it all to work out of the box.
>
> I think we have a good system as it currently exists.  Plus I like the
> idea of seeing it mature into a system-ready packaging which is easier
> if it remains more in a component form (as mentioned in Russ Albery's
> detailed message).
>
> Russ.
>
>
> Russell Beall
> University of Southern California
> Information Technology Services
>
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 10:35 PM, Chad La Joie wrote:
>
> > Do you agree with this?