Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: Shib 1.3 configuration

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: Shib 1.3 configuration


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Nate Klingenstein <>
  • Cc: Scott Cantor <>, Shibboleth Development <>
  • Subject: Re: Shib 1.3 configuration
  • Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 18:36:41 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GGbOXBIR8ZQByeat94RbAJw1pt9Ij1lubZIrCYYcHb91MaQMq3aQFdBN8ee6j490dIsM+jLAduBZNllWgrSq+cThqnPzGUALgWBAPzkyA8xaMVaCSu8O2CH6WC5G93je7ftNm1lGgrHEIMHvLzLJ4e8OycrUyZxEHZVMiUnFhYU=

On 5/23/05, Nate Klingenstein
<>
wrote:
> I like the idea of moving to more consistency here but I'd also agree
> with Scott's comment. If we used two realms -- supervillain.edu as an
> idp and example.org as an sp, for example -- I think that would be
> easiest for deployers' understanding.

Sure, that's fine. The only reason I chose example.com is that the
example.* domains are reserved precisely for this purpose. Other than
that, whatever domain you pick you're going to conflict with some real
use of that domain either now or down the road (same problem as .sso).

Tom



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page