shibboleth-dev - Shib 1.3 configuration
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: Tom Scavo <>
- To: Shibboleth Development <>
- Subject: Shib 1.3 configuration
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 17:36:14 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=FWLEz2wEXRM19YMSERbgLRTA0o2uuI22KXgGC0HQ3YHKhWAfvqy1dPueOo5nSq9Pue75YW4K+us8p4yuNbUI+8twc67M19HUYFZmjQ54JglUTDkGJSTDGmM0UBfQgfNDUzSQ5HOJnRhznjO09Ie6ylUH5cH3vGms/ki9VEo6pLQ=
In CVS HEAD, the following mix of providerIds are used in the
indicated config and metadata files.
shibboleth.xml.in:
https://sp.example.org/shibboleth
example-sites.xml.in and example-sites.xml:
https://idp.example.org/shibboleth
https://sp.example.org/shibboleth
IQ-sites.xml.in and IQ-sites.xml:
urn:mace:inqueue:example.edu
SP.xml:
urn:mace:inqueue:example.org
idp.xml.dist:
https://idp.example.org/shibboleth-idp
Since some of these are going to have to change anyway, I suggest we
use the following pair of providerIds instead:
https://idp.example.org/shibboleth
https://sp.example.com/shibboleth
In my (limited) experience, using two separate domains makes it easier
to upgrade the out-of-the-box config.
Related to this, the config files should not assume InQueue
membership. Instead a bilateral trust relationship between
idp.example.org and sp.example.com should be hardwired in.
Configuring to InQueue out-of-the-box adds significant complexity to
the install, I think.
I have actual config files and metadata files that implement these
suggestions, but everything's changed in the last couple of weeks so
they're already out of date. I'll have to reimplement from scratch.
Thanks,
Tom
- Shib 1.3 configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- RE: Shib 1.3 configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Nate Klingenstein, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- RE: Shib 1.3 configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- RE: Shib 1.3 configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/24/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/24/2005
- RE: Shib 1.3 configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- RE: Shib 1.3 configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Tom Scavo, 05/23/2005
- Re: Shib 1.3 configuration, Scott Cantor, 05/23/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.