ntacpeering - Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S
Subject: NTAC Peering Working Group
List archive
- From: Steven Wallace <>
- To: Michael H Lambert <>
- Cc: " Routing WG" <>
- Subject: Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 11:05:12 -0400
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport01.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
IMO, for now we'll be luckly to get this feature form a single
controller/network. It's going to be a while before such things exist across
controllers. This is probably a good research topic for someone (e.g., what
operations API should be exposed for network troubleshooting, and how to
expose them). My sense is that the SDN stuff is growing up much more quickly
in the data center space.
ssw
On May 30, 2013, at 10:59 AM, Michael H Lambert
<>
wrote:
> Steven,
>
> On 30 May 2013, at 10:52, Steven Wallace wrote:
>
>> I think you've hit on something that's going to require network engineers
>> to re-think certain approaches to troubleshooting. IMO, the idea of an
>> in-band probe to determine the path is simply not going to be a part of
>> the SDN future (I could be wrong, but that's my prediction). The good news
>> is that you no longer need it. What I mean is that the controller knows
>> the entire path. I would be asking for an app where the engineer can
>> easily say to AL2S "what's the path for this flow" and the app responds
>> with the complete path as it exists in realtime.
>
> If there are multiple controllers, do they all contain the entire state or
> are they just "cooperative"? I'm trying not to think about the old mbone
> traceroute that would do a hop-by-hop query.
>
> Michael
>
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, (continued)
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Michael H Lambert, 05/24/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Grover Browning, 05/29/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, John Moore, 05/29/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Grover Browning, 05/30/2013
- RE: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Paul Schopis, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Grover Browning, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Chris Spears, 05/30/2013
- RE: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Paul Schopis, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Steven Wallace, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Michael H Lambert, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Steven Wallace, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Ryan Harden, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Grover Browning, 05/30/2013
- RE: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Paul Schopis, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Steven Wallace, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Michael H Lambert, 05/30/2013
- RE: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Paul Schopis, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Michael H Lambert, 05/30/2013
- RE: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Paul Schopis, 05/31/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Scott Brim, 05/31/2013
- RE: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Paul Schopis, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Grover Browning, 05/30/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, John Moore, 05/29/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Grover Browning, 05/29/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Michael H Lambert, 05/24/2013
- Re: [2013-l3-architecture] FOR DISCUSSION: IP over AL2S, Darrell Newcomb, 05/30/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.