Megaconference

[David Devereaux-Weber <>]

Mark,

One negative experience I've had using a software codec (Cisco Jabber Video) is when a user was demonstrating a statistical analysis software program.  There was contention for CPU between the stats program and the video codec.  When CPU contention happens, both functions suffer.

Dave

-- 
David Devereaux-Weber, P.E.
Room B111
Network Services
Division of Information Technology
The University of Wisconsin - Madison
1210 W Dayton St.
Madison, WI 53706

(608)301-5481 (Google Voice)

sip:
http://cable.doit.wisc.edu/

On May 24, 2013, at 1:15 PM, "Leonard, Mark" <> wrote:

Hello Megalister's--

I'm curious if anyone out there has run a side by side comparison of say a Cisco C-20 against a 'soft client' like this--

• Mac mini 2.6Ghz Intel Core i7
• Cisco Jabber (enterprise version- MOVI)
• USB Camera with pocessing within the camera
• Pretty capable USB speaker phone

Sure…in a perfect world we would always buy the dedicated codec for video collaboration-- right?   —  but I'm really starting to wonder about reasons not to run  the $1000 set up above in non mission critical events—

How about it?

Anyone out there running a H.323 soft client  in a classroom set up? 

And yes— to make it a little tougher… I must have 30fps, 1080, and connection speeds around 1000kbs  :>)

And no— I'm not so interested in the 101 web based videoconferencing services that have popped up as this is really a 'hardware' discussion. In my eyes— the weakest link in the soft client is the camera. Buying a $3K+ USB camera to compete with the Cisco HD camera kind of defeats the purpose of looking at workarounds to a dedicated VC codec.

Thanks for looking at this-

Have a great long weekend-

~Mark

Mark Leonard

Media and Collaboration, UNH IT