Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

megaconference - Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware

Subject: Megaconference

List archive

Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Peter Hayes <>
  • To: Rusty Presley <>
  • Cc: "Leonard, Mark" <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware
  • Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 14:41:21 -0400
  • Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport01.merit.edu; dkim=hardfail (signature did not verify [final])

Tely Labs is nice because it has the wide angel lens but no PTZ.  The best one I have seen with list price of $1400 is the VDO360 PTZ USB Camera.  However, right now, I think it only does 720p.   We are currently testing a $99 1080p Android camera where you load the app on the camera itself.  It has wireless, HDMI out, and a video dual core processor, but you still have don't have the PTZ ability.  
   


Peter Hayes
CEO
202-438-3410
Spranto ID: phayes








On May 24, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Rusty Presley <> wrote:

We run Radvision's Scopiadesktop using a Microsoft lifecam studio webcam in some of our class/conference rooms.  Works well for us.  Not sure if pic specs from webcam would meet your needs. 
Rusty




From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.



-------- Original message --------
From: "Leonard, Mark" <>
Date: 05/24/2013 1:26 PM (GMT-06:00)
To:
Subject: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware


Hello Megalister's--

I'm curious if anyone out there has run a side by side comparison of say a Cisco C-20 against a 'soft client' like this--
Sure…in a perfect world we would always buy the dedicated codec for video collaboration-- right?   —  but I'm really starting to wonder about reasons not to run  the $1000 set up above in non mission critical events—

How about it?
Anyone out there running a H.323 soft client  in a classroom set up? 

And yes— to make it a little tougher… I must have 30fps, 1080, and connection speeds around 1000kbs  :>)

And no— I'm not so interested in the 101 web based videoconferencing services that have popped up as this is really a 'hardware' discussion. In my eyes— the weakest link in the soft client is the camera. Buying a $3K+ USB camera to compete with the Cisco HD camera kind of defeats the purpose of looking at workarounds to a dedicated VC codec.

Thanks for looking at this-
Have a great long weekend-

~Mark

Mark Leonard
Media and Collaboration, UNH IT





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page