megaconference - RE: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware
Subject: Megaconference
List archive
- From: Rusty Presley <>
- To: "Leonard, Mark" <>, "" <>
- Subject: RE: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 18:35:42 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport04.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
We run Radvision's Scopiadesktop using a Microsoft lifecam studio webcam in some of our class/conference rooms. Works well for us. Not sure if pic specs from webcam would meet your needs.
Rusty
From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
-------- Original message -------- From: "Leonard, Mark" <> Date: 05/24/2013 1:26 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Subject: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware Hello Megalister's--
I'm curious if anyone out there has run a side by side comparison of say a Cisco C-20 against a 'soft client' like this--
Sure…in a perfect world we would always buy the dedicated codec for video collaboration-- right? — but I'm really starting to wonder about reasons not to run the $1000 set up above in non mission critical events—
How about it?
Anyone out there running a H.323 soft client in a classroom set up?
And yes— to make it a little tougher… I must have 30fps, 1080, and connection speeds around 1000kbs :>)
And no— I'm not so interested in the 101 web based videoconferencing services that have popped up as this is really a 'hardware' discussion. In my eyes— the weakest link in the soft client is the camera. Buying a $3K+ USB camera to compete with the Cisco
HD camera kind of defeats the purpose of looking at workarounds to a dedicated VC codec.
Thanks for looking at this-
Have a great long weekend-
~Mark
Mark Leonard
Media and Collaboration, UNH IT
|
- [Megacon] Video Center Stream, Jon Winterbottom, 05/24/2013
- Re: [Megacon] Video Center Stream, Bob Gerdes, 05/24/2013
- RE: [Megacon] Video Center Stream, José Luis Rodríguez, 05/24/2013
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [Megacon] Video Center Stream, Jon Winterbottom, 05/24/2013
- [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Leonard, Mark, 05/24/2013
- [Megacon] RE: Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Zinner, Mike (MNIT), 05/24/2013
- Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Matt Carner, 05/24/2013
- RE: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Rusty Presley, 05/24/2013
- Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Peter Hayes, 05/24/2013
- RE: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Simon Horne, 05/24/2013
- Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Peter Hayes, 05/24/2013
- Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Ben Fineman, 05/24/2013
- [Megacon] RE: Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, George Wiley, 05/24/2013
- Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, David Devereaux-Weber, 05/30/2013
- RE: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Rusty Presley, 05/30/2013
- RE: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Paul Bonnett, 05/30/2013
- Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Leonard, Mark, 05/31/2013
- Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Ben Fineman, 05/31/2013
- Re: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Leonard, Mark, 05/31/2013
- RE: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Paul Bonnett, 05/30/2013
- RE: [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Rusty Presley, 05/30/2013
- [Megacon] Videoconferencing "Soft Client" vs Codec Hardware, Leonard, Mark, 05/24/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.