mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance

From: "Cantor, Scott E." <>
To: "" <>
Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 23:12:50 +0000
Accept-language: en-US

>One last question: what sort of throughput is it reasonable to expect
>from an opensaml IDP which is signing assertions?

I don't think that's really answerable, it depends what the IdP is doing.
Shibboleth apparently handles 100+ transactions at a time on good hardware
doing authentication and attribute resolution with sustained subsecond
responses. So...lots?

-- Scott

[OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
  - Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Nick Newman, 01/06/2011
    - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
  - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
    - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
      - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/07/2011
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chad La Joie, 01/07/2011
        
        [OpenSAML] certificate management, Chris Card, 01/07/2011
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] certificate management, Chad La Joie, 01/07/2011
        RE: [OpenSAML] certificate management, Chris Card, 01/07/2011
        RE: [OpenSAML] certificate management, Cantor, Scott E., 01/07/2011
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] certificate management, Tom Scavo, 01/07/2011
    - Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Brent Putman, 01/06/2011

List archive

Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance