mace-opensaml-users - Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: Nick Newman <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 13:08:15 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=g2fnUeGdR6Xdo7pM/WKgE15yk2zv9MHJcXch5DLL6pzhV+xcjV8qT0PA1rjgNisRNC oEy8+nJjefZj4LZCah6cgNMnHAkDCIBaMdblQlIdkGxZLuX2Vu3gOKVdu5AqN0T/D8te Pp6wlZggXeRXoi6QFegB5seiB+bOzTayHUwKY=
Scott,
I agree with the performance part of your answer. I'd be surprised if there's much difference.
I'm not so sure I agree about C++ being the only SP integration strategy that makes sense. I quite like my JBoss-SAML (even if nobody else does!). See https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/SHIB2/Contributions
Nick
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Cantor, Scott E. <> wrote:
> is there likely to be much difference in the performance of SAML assertionI don't think anybody's compared them. Modern Java optimizations have certainly shrunk the gap enormously from the early days.
> signing between the Java and C++ opensaml implementations? Are there
> any benchmark figures available?
While I enjoy not having to worry much about low level performance in my SP, I don't use C++ because of that, I use it because there is no other web server integration strategy that makes any sense.
-- Scott
- [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Nick Newman, 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/07/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chad La Joie, 01/07/2011
- [OpenSAML] certificate management, Chris Card, 01/07/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] certificate management, Chad La Joie, 01/07/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] certificate management, Chris Card, 01/07/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/07/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
- Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Nick Newman, 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.