Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Chris Card <>
  • To: <>
  • Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:09:38 +0000
  • Importance: Normal

thanks Scott


> > is there likely to be much difference in the performance of SAML assertion
> > signing between the Java and C++ opensaml implementations? Are there
> > any benchmark figures available?
>
> I don't think anybody's compared them. Modern Java optimizations have certainly shrunk the gap enormously from the early days.
>
> While I enjoy not having to worry much about low level performance in my SP, I don't use C++ because of that, I use it because there is no other web server integration strategy that makes any sense.
>
Does the Java implementation of signing use the same underlying C libraries for the crypto stuff (via JNI say) or is it implemented in Java?

Chris



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page