Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mace-opensaml-users - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott E." <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 19:00:04 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US

> is there likely to be much difference in the performance of SAML assertion
> signing between the Java and C++ opensaml implementations? Are there
> any benchmark figures available?

I don't think anybody's compared them. Modern Java optimizations have
certainly shrunk the gap enormously from the early days.

While I enjoy not having to worry much about low level performance in my SP,
I don't use C++ because of that, I use it because there is no other web
server integration strategy that makes any sense.

-- Scott




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page