mace-opensaml-users - [OpenSAML] signing performance

Subject: OpenSAML user discussion

List archive

[OpenSAML] signing performance

From: Chris Card <>
To: <>
Subject: [OpenSAML] signing performance
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 18:55:35 +0000
Importance: Normal

Hi,

is there likely to be much difference in the performance of SAML assertion signing between the Java and C++ opensaml implementations? Are there any benchmark figures available?

Chris

[OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
- RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
  - Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Nick Newman, 01/06/2011
    - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
  - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
    - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
      - RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/06/2011
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Cantor, Scott E., 01/06/2011
        
        RE: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chris Card, 01/07/2011
        
        Re: [OpenSAML] signing performance, Chad La Joie, 01/07/2011
        
        [OpenSAML] certificate management, Chris Card, 01/07/2011

List archive

[OpenSAML] signing performance