mace-opensaml-users - RE: Signing a SAML token
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: Signing a SAML token
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:02:11 -0400
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> I have read the specs but can't really figure out something. Does the
> signature of a SAML token, with confirmation method set to
> sender-vouches, needs to reference both the assertion and the binary
> security token?
Please use saml-dev for SAML questions. However what you're asking isn't a
SAML question because signatures in SAML cover SAML only.
From what I know of WSS, it isn't even a valid question there because SAML
assertions are not binary security tokens.
-- Scott
- Re: Signing a SAML object, (continued)
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/07/2008
- Deploying opensaml 2.0 in Jboss 4.2.0, Singh, Manish, 03/14/2008
- Re: Deploying opensaml 2.0 in Jboss 4.2.0, Chad La Joie, 03/14/2008
- Deploying opensaml 2.0 in Jboss 4.2.0, Singh, Manish, 03/14/2008
- Re: Re: Signing a SAML object, matthew . webb, 03/11/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/11/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Chad La Joie, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/12/2008
- Signing a SAML token, Benjamin Coiffe, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Chad La Joie, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Brent Putman, 03/12/2008
- RE: Signing a SAML token, Scott Cantor, 03/12/2008
- Message not available
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Brent Putman, 03/12/2008
- RE: Signing a SAML token, Scott Cantor, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Brent Putman, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Chad La Joie, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Chad La Joie, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/11/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/07/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.