mace-opensaml-users - Signing a SAML token
Subject: OpenSAML user discussion
List archive
- From: "Benjamin Coiffe" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: Signing a SAML token
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:51:29 -0400
Hi all,
I have read the specs but can't really figure out something. Does the
signature of a SAML token, with confirmation method set to
sender-vouches, needs to reference both the assertion and the binary
security token?
I ask this cause WebLogic 9.2 seems to require it and I don't understand
why?
Any help appreciated,
Thanks
Benjamin Coiffe
- Signing a SAML object, matthew . webb, 03/07/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/07/2008
- Deploying opensaml 2.0 in Jboss 4.2.0, Singh, Manish, 03/14/2008
- Re: Deploying opensaml 2.0 in Jboss 4.2.0, Chad La Joie, 03/14/2008
- Deploying opensaml 2.0 in Jboss 4.2.0, Singh, Manish, 03/14/2008
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Re: Signing a SAML object, matthew . webb, 03/11/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/11/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Chad La Joie, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/12/2008
- Signing a SAML token, Benjamin Coiffe, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Chad La Joie, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Brent Putman, 03/12/2008
- RE: Signing a SAML token, Scott Cantor, 03/12/2008
- Message not available
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Brent Putman, 03/12/2008
- RE: Signing a SAML token, Scott Cantor, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Brent Putman, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML token, Chad La Joie, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Chad La Joie, 03/12/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/11/2008
- Re: Signing a SAML object, Brent Putman, 03/07/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.