grouper-users - Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory
Subject: Grouper Users - Open Discussion List
List archive
- From: Tom Zeller <>
- To: Gagné Sébastien <>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:29:24 -0600
The bug, calling a method of an undefined or null variable, is in my
attribute resolver script definition. Could you create an issue in
jira, please ?
https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/GRP
If you ran ldappcng as
$GROUPER_HOME/bin/gsh.sh -ldappcng -sync UdeM:SubStem -entityName stem
instead of
$GROUPER_HOME/bin/gsh.sh -ldappcng -sync UdeM:SubStem
then the bug should not appear because the sAMAccountName attribute
would not be resolved by the shibboleth attribute resolver, since only
stem attributes will be resolved.
When provisioning an unknown object (an unknown spmlv2 schema entity;
"-entityName stem" is not present in the gsh parameters) ldappcng
resolves all attributes, because in my experience, performance
bottlenecks are typically in the I/O to data sources (grouper) or
provisioning targets (active directory).
Some relevant code from Psp.java (2.1.0) is in the
execute(CalcRequest, CalcResponse) method :
// attribute request context
BaseSAMLProfileRequestContext attributeRequestContext = new
BaseSAMLProfileRequestContext();
attributeRequestContext.setPrincipalName(calcRequest.getId());
// get targets specified in request before building the context
Map<String, List<Pso>> map = getTargetAndObjectDefinitions(calcRequest);
// determine attribute resolver requested attributes
LinkedHashSet<String> attributeIds = new LinkedHashSet<String>();
for (String targetId : map.keySet()) {
for (Pso psoDefinition : map.get(targetId)) {
attributeIds.addAll(psoDefinition.getSourceIds(calcRequest.getReturnData()));
}
}
attributeRequestContext.setRequestedAttributes(attributeIds);
// resolve attributes
LOG.debug("PSP '{}' - Calc {} Resolving attributes '{}'.",
new Object[] {getId(), calcRequest, attributeIds});
Map<String, BaseAttribute<?>> attributes =
getAttributeAuthority().getAttributes(attributeRequestContext);
For anyone interested.
TomZ
- [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Gagné Sébastien, 01/18/2012
- RE: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Gagné Sébastien, 01/19/2012
- Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Tom Zeller, 01/19/2012
- RE: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Gagné Sébastien, 01/19/2012
- Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Tom Zeller, 01/19/2012
- RE: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Gagné Sébastien, 01/19/2012
- Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Tom Zeller, 01/19/2012
- RE: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Gagné Sébastien, 01/20/2012
- Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Tom Zeller, 01/20/2012
- Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Tom Zeller, 01/19/2012
- RE: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Gagné Sébastien, 01/19/2012
- Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Tom Zeller, 01/19/2012
- [grouper-users] Encryption of LDAPPCNG password, Gagné Sébastien, 01/20/2012
- Re: [grouper-users] Encryption of LDAPPCNG password, Tom Zeller, 01/20/2012
- RE: [grouper-users] Encryption of LDAPPCNG password, Gagné Sébastien, 01/21/2012
- Re: [grouper-users] Encryption of LDAPPCNG password, Tom Zeller, 01/20/2012
- RE: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Gagné Sébastien, 01/19/2012
- Re: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Tom Zeller, 01/19/2012
- RE: [grouper-users] LDAPPCNG configuration with Active Directory, Gagné Sébastien, 01/19/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.