wg-multicast - RE: Multicast-related meetings in Seattle
Subject: All things related to multicast
List archive
- From: Kevin Thompson <>
- To: Greg Shepherd <>, "Kevin C. Almeroth" <>
- Cc:
- Subject: RE: Multicast-related meetings in Seattle
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 09:17:24 -0400
At 06:06 PM 9/26/99 -0700, Greg Shepherd wrote:
cisco hosted a multicast engineering workshop for I2 earlier this summer.
I believe this overview/case-study approach worked very well.
This format would work well for a WG meeting also.
I thought Cisco's event was very helpful to those who attended
We could possibly take case-studies submitted in advance to ensure a
representative sample with various topoligies/technologies.
good idea
kevin
Greg
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Kevin C. Almeroth wrote:
> >> What good does it do to deliver multicast to a campus when the campus network
> >>is not engineered to handle delivery of that traffic? Is anyone doing something
> >>that is working? What approaches to this problem exist? What are the local
> >>engineering/technical issues?
>
> This kind of problem is tough to cover at this kind of member meeting.
> It is more designed for a Techs Workshop. Who from your campus has been
> attending these? In fact, there have already been a number of events
> which focus on exactly the questions you are asking. Personally, I
> believe we are still a long way away from having good, self-contained
> answers but that's a near impossibility when just about every campus
> is different.
>
> >> I am a member of ViDe; some of my fellow committee members are convinced that
> >>practical delivery of multicast will NEVER work. I don't happen to agree with
> >>them, but I don't see anything proposed here that would make them want to
> >>reconsider.
>
> Frankly, if they aren't willing to learn there isn't much anyone can
> do about it. The way multicast (or any other service for that matter)
> typically gets deployed is if someone on the campus makes the effort
> to learn how to get it running. Granted, the amount of available
> information is somewhat sparse, but that problem is improving. Right
> now, it takes just a little bit of extra effort. And a fair number of
> campuses and gigapops have demonstrated it is possible (see I2 multicast
> WWW page for maps with lists of connected sites).
>
> Bottom line is if you (or an appropriate representative) has technical
> concerns the "backbone engineers" session would be appropriate.
> Otherwise, show up at the "neophytes" meeting. There will be a
> significant number of people in a similar situation. A driving question
> for me personally (as WG chair) is how to provide the kind of information
> you need in a way that you (or any campus) can use it.
>
> BTW, in retrospect, I think "neophyte" is exactly the category you
> would fit into... not a novice but also not an expert. Below, I
> cut-and-pasted the text from the agenda about what the "neophyte"
> session is supposed to cover:
>
> Multicast: A discussion of how the support of high-speed
> native multicast by Internet2/NGI backbones is requiring upgrades to
> campus/GigaPoP networks as well as work on multicast-capable applications.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
- Multicast-related meetings in Seattle, Kevin C. Almeroth, 09/23/1999
- RE: Multicast-related meetings in Seattle, Jill Gemmill, 09/24/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Multicast-related meetings in Seattle, Kevin C. Almeroth, 09/25/1999
- RE: Multicast-related meetings in Seattle, Greg Shepherd, 09/26/1999
- RE: Multicast-related meetings in Seattle, Kevin Thompson, 09/27/1999
- RE: Multicast-related meetings in Seattle, Jill Gemmill, 09/27/1999
- RE: Multicast-related meetings in Seattle, Kevin C. Almeroth, 09/27/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.