sip.edu - RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above.
Subject: SIP in higher education
List archive
RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above.
Chronological Thread
- From: "Oscar Alonso Blanco" <>
- To: <>, <>
- Subject: RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above.
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:16:56 +0100
At first, Thanks for your interest and all your
responses Secondly, I explain me better, regarding with
directory support, the best manner of explain this is with a SIP.EDU cookbook
illustration: Ok, this is the original deployment proposed from
SIP.EDU cookbook . My deployment can differ a little bit from this
original. Actually I have an heterogeneous telephony network that haves a
traditional telephony and IP telephony based and Cisco Unified Comunications
Call Manager 6.1 recently installed. The ip telephony network haves a couple
of Cisco call processing systems working as a publisher and subscriber, a
couple of MGCP gateways controlled by the call-managers and attached via PRI ISO
QSIG to an Ericsson MD110 system to main traditional telephony system, this
MD110 can route the incoming and outgoing calls to the correct destination (we
can have calls between the call manager phones and MD110 phones or outside
phones guided by the md110 with the correct path). The main goal of all of this is establish a sip trunk
or something similar, between the SIP proxy and directly to the Cisco Call
Manager, doing this if any call belongs to the call manager this routes
directly to ip extension if not reroutes the call to MD110 telephony system via
mgcp pri-iso-qsig. This schematic is optimal because our university plans
to migrate all the extensions to the Cisco Ip telephony system, and doing that
we don’t have any direct dependency of the MD110 telephony system We think in a schematic like this: Regarding to Steven question, I’m referring to a
LDAP directory integration, that explain into the sip.edu cookbook how the sip proxy
retrieves the mail to the ldap directory and receives the extension number and
then the sip proxy originates a SIP invite against the extension and the sip
trunk. Our call manager’s haves completely a private range
direction, we planned to put the sip proxy with a private and public ip
directions (one to the CCM and LDAP database as all your ip telephony system)
(and a public ip direction to receipt the que queries from the sip.edu system. As ever thanks in advance for all your responses -----Mensaje original----- If you wish to add a SIP proxy either OpenSER/OpenSIPs
or SER will work fine. I'm not sure what you mean when you say "...
supports Directory to query." Both proxy servers will maintain a database
of contacts based on register messages and a database of subscribers provided
you compile in MySQL support. Does Call manager 6 speak SIP to gateways or does it
still only speak MGCP? What about support for alphabetic userid in the R-URI
and DNS SRV support? If CCM supports these then you may be able to interoperate
with SIP.edu without adding the proxy. > -----Original Message----- > From: Joao Pereira [mailto:] > Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 5:46 AM > To: > Subject: Re: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco
Unified Communications > Call Manager 6 or above. > > Hello > You need to install OpenSER and create a trunk
form the UCCM to > OpenSER. > Regards > Joao Pereira > > > wrote: > > Hello Everybody: > > > > > > We are from the Autonomous Barcelona
University(UAB) and recently we > installed a new VoIP PBX UCCM 6.1(2)from cisco
over sip protocol. We > are thinking to integrate SIP.EDU in our
university but we don't have > any experience of people doing that with our
configuration. > > > > Watching the SIP.EDU cookbook and comparing,
Our Cisco VoIP PBX > haves a coupple of MGCP gateways and SIP support
and we think that is > possible to integrate with a SIP PROXY that
supports Directory to query > (like SER), doing that the CCM's works as a sip
gateway against the > SIP PROXY. > > > > Has anyone any experience with this kind of
configuration? > > > > > > Thanks in advance to everybody! > > > > > > Óscar > > > > > > > > |
- Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., oalonso, 11/10/2008
- Re: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Joao Pereira, 11/10/2008
- RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Steven C. Blair, 11/10/2008
- Re: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Chris Kauffman, 11/10/2008
- Re: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Jan Ruzicka, 11/10/2008
- Re: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Dave Laurentino, 11/10/2008
- RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Steven C. Blair, 11/10/2008
- RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Jesse M. Hindmarsh, 11/10/2008
- RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Steven C. Blair, 11/10/2008
- Re: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Dave Laurentino, 11/10/2008
- RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Oscar Alonso Blanco, 11/12/2008
- RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., J. Israel Ortega Aceves, 11/13/2008
- RE: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Steven C. Blair, 11/10/2008
- Re: [sip.edu] Experiences with Cisco Unified Communications Call Manager 6 or above., Joao Pereira, 11/10/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.