Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] Shib WG Topics

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: [Shib-Dev] Shib WG Topics


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To:
  • Cc: Chad La Joie <>
  • Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] Shib WG Topics
  • Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:54:53 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dTgwBTNEBVgDD/FGLGzpyc9NF2RNVvk444xrdB5OjEOyq06JnOTj7/LXfWZ/WCLIaz +GDKPYgJChYnimCA6uIc3Av0GcNmsIsVMhQBDiryGrMcGDOU/PnkLhk8V6xMzcRn6PxJ Liako+oDMEy65B1POOX8jy+0IMxPsM1Bdb2bY=

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Chad La Joie
<>
wrote:
> What are you hoping to get out of such a discussion?  What are you
> hoping the audience (which are usually general deployers not developers)
> will get out of it?

Well, since the project isn't going to address this topic until IdP
v3.0 way down the road, deployers might like to know that 1) there's a
contributed login handler that uses OTP technologies X and protocols
Y, 2) there's a project at Surfnet that uses the same protocols as the
contributed handler, and 3) Google 2-factor authn uses the same
protocols as well. So there's a lot of synergy going on in this space
right now.

But now that you mention it, you're probably right, the WG session is
probably not the place to discuss this. You probably already have a
full agenda of more relevant topics.

Thanks,
Tom



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page