Shibboleth Developers

[Chad La Joie <>]

The way we've done it in the past is that either we, the Shib team, pick
out something we think is neat/useful and see if we can't get one of the
developers to talk about it or an extension developer contacts us,
offers to speak, and the Shib team considers it.

I'm not aware of anyone having offered anything up this time and trying
to get the consortium off the ground has pretty much been all-consuming
for the Shib team so we didn't really think about asking anyone with the
exception that I asked Nicole to given an update on the consortium.

On 4/4/11 2:23 PM, Tom Scavo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Cantor, Scott E. 
> <>
>  wrote:
>> On 4/4/11 12:28 PM, "Tom Scavo" 
>> <>
>>  wrote:
>>> FWIW, this is the kind of stuff I'd like to hear about at the Shib WG
>>> session at I2MM in Arlington in a couple of weeks.
>>
>> That would necessitate people using them be there to present about them. I
>> don't think anybody involved with the project is doing anything with it.
> 
> By "them" do you mean the handler contributed by Fredrik? That's a
> fair question. I'll see what I can find out on the shib-users mailing
> list and then I'll see if I can drum up some support to test the
> handler internally.
> 
> Or by "them" do you mean the OATH protocols (HOTP, TOTP, OCRA)? The
> latter question could be discussed at a high level, without much
> deployment experience (although certainly deployment experience should
> be factored into the decision).


-- 
Chad La Joie
http://itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered