Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] Shib WG Topics

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: [Shib-Dev] Shib WG Topics


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] Shib WG Topics
  • Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:37:01 -0400
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ZVijQmbRgfmx1Rrt+7UwACHF5fnw2E9Obwc+98ezVjL9lKvBiUJoNNJ1RoA9o0sDFu WKARMdwmMXk8moz0wy1BG040LvhT0I/y22XZj8UDIMeEJvlrkTaTNwj57+xmBLOES/xI zCqRBd6o6wDtQjGQhdeMISWQ9ITKHGXhQolOM=
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Cantor, Scott E.
<>
wrote:
> On 4/4/11 1:06 PM, "Christopher Bongaarts"
> <>
> wrote:
>>Permanent redirects.
>
> I'm not in favor of permanent redirects, but as long as it's accompanied
> by a nag screen, I'm not strongly against it.
>
>>Any suggestions for the best people to lobby for keeping the redirects
>>around?
>
> I'm not really sure who "owns" spaces in that sense. I guess it's the I2MI
> as a whole, which doesn't really answer the question about who to lobby.

I would be happy to lobby Internet2 for *something* but the shib
project has to tell me what to lobby *for*. I'm not hearing consensus
from the shib team on this issue.

Tom

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page