Shibboleth Developers

["Cantor, Scott E." <>]

On 4/6/11 9:46 AM, "Steven Carmody" 
<>
 wrote:
>I think it would be useful to have some discussion at the WG session
>about what the consent mechanism in IDP v3 should display; this would be
>a followup to the discussion from the recent developers meeting. What
>are the issues and tradeoffs, in trying to improve usability and
>"understandability" of the consent screens?

As I understood it, the UI model we were scoping was "what uApprove does"
to avoid making the v3 work dependent on a long negotiation (with no real
experience to drive it) over consent UI.

There were discussions about the isRequired problem and the OR problem at
the dev meeting, which I've been delinquent in writing up, but they don't
involve any significant changes to the UI. In particular, we were NOT
planning to provide per-attribute (or per-value) consent, which is what
would open up a lot of the discussion from ground zero.

I will try and get the discussion on metadata syntax and so forth written
up in the wiki, sorry for being late on that.

-- Scott