Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] yet another java SP implementation....

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

RE: [Shib-Dev] yet another java SP implementation....


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott E." <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] yet another java SP implementation....
  • Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 21:10:06 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
> This is the second major vendor we've encountered that saw that text,
> and for their own reasons decided to go ahead and implement that profile.

"For their own reasons" == to ignore discovery.

Since SAML conformance effectively requires IdP-initiated SSO, that isn't
really a stretch.

> Is there any sort of warning that could be associated with the undefined
> step 1, alerting implementers that this may not be supported in some
> deploys?

Warning where?

-- Scott


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page