Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

shibboleth-dev - Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF

Subject: Shibboleth Developers

List archive

Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF


Chronological Thread 
  • From: André Cruz <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF
  • Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:11:37 +0000

On Dec 22, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Scott Cantor wrote:

I tested again and surprisingly it seems that IE indeed is blocking the
cookies with or without this header. Nevertheless, IE seems in some
cases to preselect the right entry in the drop down list even if cookies
are blocked (I haven't checked if it really doesn't send them but at
least IE says it blocked the cookie... and I wouldn't dare not to trust
Microsoft, would I :) ? ). This even is the case across restarts of IE...
So, I assumed it could have to do something with IE remembering entries
from some drop down lists provided name/id of the form/select element.
However, this also didn't turn out to be the case because renaming form
and select element didn have any effect either. So, right now I don't
really know why it seems to unless I delete the cookies in the temp
folder and do a restart.

That in a nutshell is why I was skeptical. ;-)

I'm somewhat anal about understanding why things work or don't work before I
come off the fence about it. With about 90,000 users here, inevitably it
doesn't work for a lot of them if there are any holes.

Even so you should try it. It's working here with IE 6, 7,8 and we have 5M users.

Just don't forget to send the header with all the content served from the 3rd party domain. We were not sending it with static content and sometimes it didn't work.

André





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page