shibboleth-dev - RE: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF
Subject: Shibboleth Developers
List archive
- From: "Scott Cantor" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: RE: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:59:53 -0500
- Organization: The Ohio State University
> The embedded wayf code doesn't use frames and although I did suspect
> this would cause problems in IE, it apparently does not.
I would assume there are overlaps between the way frames work and the way
Javascript loaded from another domain would work, but perhaps not.
> I tested it in
> IE 7 (Medium Security), that has an IFRAME which loads another page from
> the same server that contains the embedded WAYF. This will display the
> right entry that only will be displayed if the cookie also is being sent
> to the central WAYF that generates the .js file that is loaded.
> I also tested this on another host in a different domain and this also
> seems to work.
If you mean Medium privacy, that level blocks third-party cookies under a
variety of circumstances. It's hard to see how you could get around that if
you're dealing with a second domain.
-- Scott
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, André Cruz, 12/19/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Scott Cantor, 12/19/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, André Cruz, 12/19/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Lukas Haemmerle, 12/22/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Scott Cantor, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, André Cruz, 12/22/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Scott Cantor, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, André Cruz, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Lukas Haemmerle, 12/22/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Scott Cantor, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, André Cruz, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Lukas Haemmerle, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, André Cruz, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Lukas Haemmerle, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Lukas Haemmerle, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, André Cruz, 12/22/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Scott Cantor, 12/22/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, André Cruz, 12/22/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Scott Cantor, 12/22/2008
- RE: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Scott Cantor, 12/19/2008
- Re: [Shib-Dev] Central WAYF + Distributed WAYF - Disadvantages = Embedded WAYF, Lukas Haemmerle, 12/22/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.